Author Guidelines

The submission has not been previously published in full text or apart of it.
The submission is original, neither a compilation nor a translation.
Manner of writing the complete article can refer to the template which you can download here.
For manuscript in Bahasa Indonesia, please use Ejaan yang Disempurnakan (EYD) as can be download here.
Arabic Transliteration guideline can be download here.
The submission is a critical review, or empirical research focusing on Islamic business and management, which covers:

Empirical research-based manuscript use formats: Introduction, Literature Review, Research Method, Results and Discussion, and Conclusions.

Introduction: consist of backgroung problem, briefly literature review, research question, and research objective.
Literature Review: this section explains the theoretical framework that used in this research, a review of the previous research in the area
Research Method: consist type of research, subject and object, data collection techniques, data analysis technique, location and time of research.
Result: contains brief data presentation, analysis and research findings that contribute to the development of Islamic business and management. It contains the analysis based on the research question.
Discussion: contains of the understanding of the findings and the comparison with the theory and/or similar research.
Conclusion: the conclusion is not a summary of the manuscript. Conclusion. Conclusion part consists of the answer of the research question(s) or the main points of discussion.

Critical Review-based and idea/conceptual study use format: Introduction, Summary, Critique, and Conclusion.

Introduction: The length of an introduction is usually one paragraph for a journal article review and two or three paragraphs for a longer book review. Include a few opening sentences that announce the author(s) and the title, and briefly explain the topic of the text. Present the aim of the text and summarise the main finding or key argument. Conclude the introduction with a brief statement of your evaluation of the text. This can be a positive or negative evaluation or, as is usually the case, a mixed response.
Summary: Present a summary of the key points along with a limited number of examples. You can also briefly explain the author's purpose/intentions throughout the text and you may briefly describe how the text is organised. The summary should only make up about a third of the critical review.
Critique: The critique should be a balanced discussion and evaluation of the strengths, weakness and notable features of the text. Remember to base your discussion on specific criteria. Good reviews also include other sources to support your evaluation (remember to reference).

You can choose how to sequence your critique. Here are some examples to get you started:

Most important to least important conclusions you make about the text.
If your critique is more positive than negative, then present the negative points first and the positive last.
If your critique is more negative than positive, then present the positive points first and the negative last.
If there are both strengths and weakness for each criterion you use, you need to decide overall what your judgement is. For example, you may want to comment on a key idea in the text and have both positive and negative comments. You could begin by stating what is good about the idea and then concede and explain how it is limited in some way. While this example shows a mixed evaluation, overall you are probably being more negative than positive.
In long reviews, you can address each criteria you choose in a paragraph, including both negative and positive points. For very short critical reviews (one page or less) where your comments will be briefer, include a paragraph of positive aspects and another of negative.
You can also include recommendations for how the text can be improved in terms of ideas, research approach; theories or frameworks used can also be included in the critique section.

Restate your overall opinion of the text.
Briefly present recommendations.
If necessary some further qualification or explanation of your judgement can be included. This can help your critique sound fair and reasonable.

Before submitting an article, the main author first completes and signs the publication ethics statement. form can download here, also fill out the curriculum vitae form which can be downloaded here.
Manuscript must be submited via OJS system.

Firstly, the author should register as either an author or reviewer (checking role as author or reviewer) in the Register.
After the registration step is completed, log in as an author, click in New Submission. The article submission stage consists of five stages, such as:(1). Start, (2). Upload Submission, (3). Enter Metadata, (4). Upload Supplementary Files, (5). Confirmation.
In the Start column, chose Journal Section (Full Article), check all the checklists.
In the Upload Submission Columns, upload the manuscript files in Ms. Word format in this column.
In the Enter Metadata columns, fill in with all the author data and affiliation. Including the Article Title, Abstract and Indexing Keywords.
In the Upload Supplementary Files columns, the author is allowed to upload supplementary files, the Publication Ethic Statement and Curriculum Vitae (at number 9 above), or any other else.
In the Confirmation columns, if the data you entered are all correct already, then click Finish Submission.
If the author has difficulties in the submission process through the online system, please contact Mabsya: Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Syariah editorial team at https://ejournal.uinsaizu.ac.id/index.php/mabsya

The incoming manuscript will check the similarity using Turnitin with a maximum tolerance of 20%. If the results show more than 20%, the manuscript will be returned to be improved by the author.